Cybersecurity Benchmark Results
Cyber threat detection from security logs and alerts. Per-language Top-3 Hit Rate, latency, cost, and competitor comparison.
Note: Our metrics are from internal test suites. Competitor claims carry a per-vendor verification date and source in the table below; figures are self-reported by the respective vendors and re-verified at least every 90 days - comparisons older than that, or not yet verified, are marked under review rather than presented as current. We encourage you to run your own evaluation on your content.
90.7%
Avg Production Top-3
15
Languages
200
Indicators
-
Latency p95
Cybersecurity Per-Language Top-3 Hit Rate
Representative languages shown. The complete 15-language matrix - including per-language sample counts and hit/miss detail - is available to customers and evaluators after sign-in.
| Language | Ranked Top-3 | Production Top-3 |
|---|---|---|
| ENbench-cyber-2026-09-en | 93.3% | 95.3% |
| DEbench-cyber-2026-09-de | 85.3% | 86.7% |
| JAbench-cyber-2026-09-ja | 85.3% | 87.3% |
Ranked Top-3 reports raw ranking. Production Top-3 applies the detector confidence threshold and is the primary release metric. Metrics are generated reproducibly from version-controlled evaluation artifacts. See benchmark methodology.
These are hit rates over a labeled benchmark set, not alert precision on your traffic - the share of flags that are true positives depends on prevalence in your content. Translate your own measured rates into expected alerts and review workload with sentiqra-prevalence.py. The separate held-out decision-quality evaluation reports false-positive rates, abstention, and per-analyzer weak spots with uncertainty intervals - read it alongside this table.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Cybersecurity | Splunk ES (Corr... | Microsoft Senti... | Elastic Securit... |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evidence verified | - | Under review | Under review | Under review |
| Type | Deterministic, versioned analysis | Under review | Under review | Under review |
| Languages | 15 | Under review | Under review | Under review |
| Indicators | 200 | Under review | Under review | Under review |
| Avg Production Top-3 | 90.7% | Under review | Under review | Under review |
| Latency p50 | - | Under review | Under review | Under review |
| Latency p95 | - | Under review | Under review | Under review |
| Cost / 1K calls | See pricing | Under review | Under review | Under review |
| Deterministic | Yes | Under review | Under review | Under review |
| Audit Trail | Yes (reproducible) | Under review | Under review | Under review |
| Per-Indicator Signal Score | Yes (signal-match strength) | Under review | Under review | Under review |
| Custom Taxonomy | Yes | Under review | Under review | Under review |
Competitor Analysis
Splunk ES (Correlation Search)
Under review — vendor claims pending re-verification
Microsoft Sentinel (Analytics Rules)
Under review — vendor claims pending re-verification
Elastic Security (Detection Rules)
Under review — vendor claims pending re-verification
All Benchmarks
Compare all 8 products
Benchmark Results
Per-language Top-3 Hit Rate
Benchmark Methodology
How we measure Top-3 Hit Rate
Full Comparison
Sentiqra vs all competitors
Quickstart Guide
First API call in under 5 minutes
Pricing
From Free to Enterprise
Performance Dashboard
Latency, uptime, throughput snapshot
Legal Disclaimer
Benchmark methodology claims
Try Cybersecurity Now
Test the detection engine yourself in our free playground. No API key required.
Open Playground