We are currently building something exciting and will be launching soon. Registration is temporarily closed. Launching soon — registration temporarily closed.

Solutions / Intelligence & Risk powered by Crisis Intelligence

Your analysts cannot read every report. Narrow the stream they inspect.

Screen multilingual reports, news, field updates, and OSINT streams across 21 languages - Ukrainian, Russian, Hebrew, Turkish among them - and surface only the events that deserve attention.

Who it's for

Intelligence analyst

A prioritized queue instead of a firehose.

OSINT lead

Normalized event signals across languages.

Strong fit if

  • Analysts triage high-volume multilingual text
  • Coverage must hold outside English
  • Reports have to be reproducible later

The pipeline

Sentiqra supplies the evidence. Your systems decide what happens next.

Screen reports and feeds for events - pipeline diagram

Sentiqra does not make the final decision. It supplies structured signals to the systems that do.

Stored with every decision

Request ID · configuration ID · fingerprint · policy version · action taken

You control: analyst routing and prioritization · watchlists and escalation thresholds · situation reporting and correlation

Before Sentiqra / With Sentiqra

Before With Sentiqra
Read every report Screen to a reviewable queue
Manual tagging Structured event signals
Single-language tooling One multilingual interface

What you receive

Not a generic "unsafe" flag - structured signals your policy engine can route on.

  • Crisis-event categories and indicators
  • Confidence scores per signal
  • Detected language and versioned configuration

Crisis Intelligence - response preview · illustrative

Humanitarian Migration very high
└ Humanitarian Access very high
└ Displacement very high
Languageen
Configurationsqcfg_EMKKGD6F
Fingerprintfp_7a5b...c34
Signaturesig_ed25519_d291...68e

Three workflows this powers

1

Crisis event monitoring

Screen streams for displacement, access, and escalation signals - the 90% that was not relevant never reaches the analyst.

2

Conflict escalation queues

Prioritize reports that indicate deteriorating situations across 21 languages, including Ukrainian, Russian, Hebrew, and Turkish.

3

Program evaluation

Reproduce a historical analysis for a post-crisis report - same corpus, same pinned configuration, same signals.

A gate decides what specialists never see

Conditional escalation saves analyzer runs, but the escalation rule also filters what Discrimination Analysis and Cybersecurity receive. If the gate passes 95% of relevant cases and the specialist detects 95% of what reaches it, end-to-end recall is 0.95 × 0.95 = 0.9025 - measured as conditional rates, with no independence assumption. Before adopting the router, replay the frozen workflow (sentiqra/workflow/v1) against a baseline that runs each escalated analyzer directly and measure the relevant cases the rule excludes.

  • Freeze routing rules and the full configuration set per workflow version - reprocessing reproduces both routing decisions and the final policy outcome.
  • Every stage records completed, failed, or deliberately skipped. A skipped analyzer is never a negative finding.
  • Domain signals stay separate - a combined decision model needs its own validation; scores are not multiplied or averaged into a probability.
Validate a staged pipeline with sentiqra-workflow.py →

Replay any result, exactly.

Every successful analysis result carries a signed verification receipt: a configuration ID (sqcfg_...), a result fingerprint (fp2_...), an input commitment (ic3_...), and an Ed25519 signature (sig_ed25519_...). Keep them with the decision they produced - re-running the same input under the same supported configuration and output profile returns the same canonical result, whether that's an appeal next week or an audit next year.

Verify a receipt

Proof

21 languages including the ones crises actually unfold in - Ukrainian, Russian, Hebrew, Turkish, Polish, and 16 more.

Per-language benchmarks

Crisis Intelligence on every plan - from Free (5K runs/mo) to Enterprise. See pricing →

Prove fit on your own data.

A 30-minute evaluation path: export real examples, run in parallel, compare signal quality, and replay the receipts.

  1. 1. Export 100-500 real examples from your workload - including the hard cases.
  2. 2. Label each with the outcome you actually want (route / hold / allow).
  3. 3. Run them through the free tier against the analyzers on this page.
  4. 4. Compare our signals to your labels - where we agree, where we miss.
  5. 5. Tune your thresholds on the misses, re-run, and confirm the improvement.
  6. 6. Replay the receipts to confirm identical results - that's your audit trail.

Often paired with: Information Integrity (manipulation signals in the same feed) · Multi-Domain Orchestration (conditional escalation to other analyzers)

Crisis feeds are also manipulation feeds - most analyst teams pair this with Information Integrity so event detection and narrative tracking run on the same stream.