We are currently building something exciting and will be launching soon. Registration is temporarily closed. Launching soon — registration temporarily closed.

Solutions / Security & Fraud powered by Cybersecurity

Your analysts already have more alerts than they can read. Normalize the text before it reaches them.

Sentiqra turns reported phishing, social-engineering, and threat text into structured signals that route cleanly into your SIEM, SOAR, and analyst workflows - no human read first.

Who it's for

Security engineer

Integrate normalized signals into SIEM, SOAR, or internal workflows.

SOC manager

Prioritize analyst attention and make triage logic more consistent.

Security governance

Preserve configuration and verification evidence behind automated analysis.

Strong fit if

  • Inbound messages or alerts need triage
  • Lures and credential threats reach your users
  • Security tooling needs structured signals, not prose

The pipeline

Sentiqra supplies the evidence. Your systems decide what happens next.

Normalize threat text for the SOC - pipeline diagram

Sentiqra does not make the final decision. It supplies structured signals to the systems that do.

Stored with every decision

Request ID · configuration ID · fingerprint · policy version · action taken

You control: siem / soar routing rules · analyst triage and escalation · incident response and blocking

Before Sentiqra / With Sentiqra

Before With Sentiqra
Free-form alert text Normalized threat signals
Manual interpretation Machine-readable indicators
Opaque routing Explicit signal → workflow mapping

What you receive

Not a generic "unsafe" flag - structured signals your policy engine can route on.

  • Phishing, impersonation, and credential-threat signals
  • Confidence scores per signal
  • Versioned configuration and fingerprint

Cybersecurity - response preview · illustrative

Phishing Delivery very high
└ Credential Lure very high
└ Urgency Lure very high
Languageen
Configurationsqcfg_6X29ABXM
Fingerprintfp_2f8e...b41
Signaturesig_ed25519_3e9c...a52

Three workflows this powers

1

Reported-phishing triage

An MSSP normalizes tens of thousands of user-reported emails per day into threat signals before an analyst ever opens one - the queue is prioritized, not just longer.

2

Threat-intel normalization

Turn vendor reports, OSINT, and analyst notes into searchable, structured indicators that feed the same taxonomy.

3

Security-aware ticket escalation

Detect account-access and credential-risk signals in customer tickets before normal support handles them - the security case never sits in the wrong queue.

What the first 30 days look like

Week 1

Pipe a sample of inbound alerts/reports through the API - first structured signals flowing within the week.

Week 2

Map signal codes to your SIEM/SOAR routing rules (Splunk, Sentinel, or XSOAR playbooks).

Week 3

Tune thresholds on shadow traffic, then dark-launch on one alert class.

Week 4

Cut the first triage lane over; keep receipts for every auto-routed case.

Deterministic by construction, provable by receipt.

A signed verification receipt - configuration ID (sqcfg_...), result fingerprint (fp2_...), input commitment (ic3_...), and Ed25519 signature (sig_ed25519_...) - ships with every successful analysis result. Pin it to the stored decision and a later replay under the same supported configuration and output profile yields the identical canonical result - the difference between "the model said so" and evidence.

Verify a receipt

Proof

Security buyers expect quantified outcomes. The published eval: 147-150 generated test cases per language across 15 languages, Production Top-3 85.3-96.6% - and every benchmark row is tied to a configuration ID you can replay.

Cybersecurity benchmarks

Cybersecurity on every plan - from Free (5K runs/mo) to Enterprise. See pricing →

Prove fit on your own data.

A 30-minute evaluation path: export real examples, run in parallel, compare signal quality, and replay the receipts.

  1. 1. Export 100-500 real examples from your workload - including the hard cases.
  2. 2. Label each with the outcome you actually want (route / hold / allow).
  3. 3. Run them through the free tier against the analyzers on this page.
  4. 4. Compare our signals to your labels - where we agree, where we miss.
  5. 5. Tune your thresholds on the misses, re-run, and confirm the improvement.
  6. 6. Replay the receipts to confirm identical results - that's your audit trail.

Often paired with: Phishing & Account Protection (the account-takeover-specific workflow) · Multi-Domain Orchestration (staging Cybersecurity behind a primary screen)

Most SOC teams start with this page and add Phishing & Account Protection within a month - account-takeover lures are the highest-volume subset of what this analyzer already flags.