Map coordinated influence operations before they shape the narrative.
A restricted analyzer for information-warfare detection: narrative coordination, state-aligned messaging, and astroturfed amplification across multilingual sources. Deployed under custom agreements only - it is not part of the self-serve API or public plans.
Who it's for
Intelligence analyst
A prioritized coordination queue instead of a firehose.
Platform-integrity lead
Structured signals for investigations and takedown reviews.
Research institution
Reproducible measurements of narrative coordination over time.
What this does not do
- -Not available through the public API, SDKs, or playground
- -Not a censorship or automated-blocking tool - analyst decision support only
- -Signals describe coordination patterns in text, not attribution to actors or states
- -Deployment requires a signed agreement with acceptable-use terms
Strong fit if
- Analysts triage high-volume multilingual text
- Coverage must hold outside English
- Reports have to be reproducible later
The pipeline
Sentiqra supplies the evidence. Your systems decide what happens next.
Sentiqra does not make the final decision. It supplies structured signals to the systems that do.
Stored with every decision
Request ID · configuration ID · fingerprint · policy version · action taken
You control: analyst judgment and escalation · attribution and reporting decisions · watchlist scope and data retention
Before Sentiqra / With Sentiqra
| Before | With Sentiqra |
|---|---|
| Keyword watchlists | Semantic coordination signals |
| Manual pattern-hunting | A reviewable flagged queue |
| Anecdotal findings | Receipt-backed, replayable evidence |
What you receive
Not a generic "unsafe" flag - structured signals your policy engine can route on.
- Coordination and narrative-pattern categories
- Confidence scores per signal
- Detected language and versioned configuration
Information Warfare - response preview · illustrative
Three workflows this powers
1
Influence-operation monitoring
Screen multilingual streams for synchronized messaging and narrative-template reuse - the coordination that keyword lists miss.
2
Election & platform integrity
Flag astroturfed amplification clusters for analyst review before they trend, with receipts for every flag.
3
Narrative tracking over time
Replay pinned configurations across time windows - same corpus, same configuration, comparable signals.
Deterministic by construction, provable by receipt.
A signed verification receipt - configuration ID (sqcfg_...), result fingerprint (fp2_...), input commitment (ic3_...), and Ed25519 signature (sig_ed25519_...) - ships with every successful analysis result. Pin it to the stored decision and a later replay under the same supported configuration and output profile yields the identical canonical result - the difference between "the model said so" and evidence.
Proof
Same engine, stricter terms: deterministic signals, pinned configurations, and signed receipts - deployed under agreement, not self-serve keys.
Talk to Solutions EngineeringNot on public plans. Access by agreement.
Information Warfare is deployed under custom agreements with acceptable-use terms - scoped keys, agreed data handling, and a named point of contact. It does not appear in self-serve pricing and cannot be called with a standard API key.
Evaluation happens with us.
Scoped evaluations run under agreement: your corpus, a pinned configuration, receipt-backed results you can replay. Start with a briefing.
Talk to Solutions Engineering →Often paired with: Information Integrity (the self-serve manipulation analyzer) · Crisis & OSINT Intelligence (event correlation in the same streams) · Multi-Domain Orchestration (staged pipelines under your control)
Information Integrity covers the self-serve manipulation techniques; Information Warfare adds coordination-pattern detection under agreement - most deployments run both on the same stream.
Access by agreement · Not a self-serve plan